- Author
- Pyne, S. J.
- Title
- History With Fire In Its Eye: An Introduction to Fire in America.
- Coporate
- Arizona State Univ., Tempe
- Journal
- Natural Hazards Observer, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1-22, September 2002
- Distribution
- WEBSITE: http://www.nhc.rtp.nc.us/tserve/nattrans/ntuseland/ essays/fire.htm FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Pyne's Website at Arizona State University: http://www.asu.edu/
- Keywords
- forest fires | combustion | wildland fires | fire fighters | fire fighting | human beings | fire statistics | case histories | agriculture | ecology | controlled burning | fire seasons | education | weather effects
- Identifiers
- humanities of fire; biomass; causes of fires (1880, U.S.); role of fire in wilderness and nature reserves; increased mixing of wildland and cities; relative merits of fire control and controlled fire; status of burning in a context of global change
- Abstract
- For the 1880 census, Charles Sargent mapped forest fires. Fire was nearly everywhere, some places more vigorously than others. The amount of burning was, by today's standards, staggering. A developing nation, still primarily agricultural, the United States had a fire-flushed landscape not unlike those of Brazil and Indonesia in more recent decades. While lightning accounted for some ignition, and steam power (notably locomotives) for a growing fraction, the principal sources of fire were peoplepeople burning for hunting, for traditional foraging, for landclearing, for clearing field fallow, for pasturage, for the ecological equivalent of housecleaning. And of course there was a significant amount of sheer fire littering. Where spark met large caches of combustibles (as around logged sites), horrific fires, implacable as hurricanes, broke out. The idea that one might abolish fire seemed quixotic, in fact, dangerous. Without fire most lands were uninhabitable. Free-burning fires came and went with the seasons, as unstoppable as the movement of the sun across the heavens. Right-thinking conservationists, as good Progressives, argued for government intervention to stop them.