FireDOC Search

Author
Liu, S. T. | Kelly, G. E. | Terlizzi, C. P.
Title
Evaluating the Off-Cycle Losses of a Gas-Fired, Power Vented Furnace Employing Post Purge.
Coporate
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
Sponsor
Department of Energy, Washington, DC
Report
NISTIR 4908, August 1992, 30 p.
Distribution
Available from National Technical Information Service
Keywords
ANSI/ASHRAE 103 | burner off-cycle | calculation procedure | DOE test procedure | furnace/boiler test | off-cycle loss | performance test | post purge | power-vented burner | tracer gas test | purging
Abstract
A gas-fired, induced draft furnace employing post purge for venting after the burner shut off was tested by using a continuous tracer gas measurement technique over the entire off-cycle to determine the off-cycle sensible loss for various durations of post-purge. The results were compared with those obtained by the existing optional tracer gas method described in ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 103-1988. The existing optional tracer gas procedure uses tracer gas data obtained at one prescribed time in the off-cycle along with an analytical procedure to calculate the loss. This optional procedure was found to under-estimate the off-cycle loss and to give significant error with longer post purge durations. A new analytical procedure was developed to correct the deficiency in the existing procedure. The new procedure divides the off-cycle period into two intervals. The loss during the purging interval was calculated analytically by assuming a linear variation of the flue gas temperature and a constant volumetric flow rate of the flue gas. The loss during the interval after post-purge was calculated by the existing optional tracer gas procedure where the prescribed time to measure the one point tracer gas data was delayed by the length of the post-purge interval. The total off-cycle loss calculated by the new procedure gave reasonably good agreement with the integrated results from the continuous tracer gas measurement technique over the entire off-cycle. The new procedure is simpler to apply than the one using the continuous tracer gas measurement and requires only a small increase in the data taking effort and some minor revision of the existing test and calculation procedures.