FireDOC Search

Author
Kennedy, I. M. | Yam, C. | Rapp, D. C. | Santoro, R. J. | Tsang, W.
Title
Modeling and Measurements of Soot and Species in a Laminar Diffusion Flame.
Coporate
California Univ., Davis Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park
Journal
Combustion and Flame, Vol. 107, No. 4, 368-382, December 1996
Sponsor
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD National Instrument of Environmental Health Sciences Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Washington, DC
Contract
NIST-GRANT-60NANBOD1053 AFOSR-GRANT-60NANBOD1035
Keywords
soot | laminar flames | diffusion flames | ethene | chemical reactions | equations
Identifiers
initial conditions; chemical mechanism; numerical scheme
Abstract
A model of laminar, soot-laden ethene diffusion flames has been developed and compared with measurements in nonsooting and sooting flames. Concentrations of stable gas-phase species were measured with mass spectrometry; laser-induced fluorescence was used to measure the OH concentrations. A system of elementary reactions was used to describe the gas-phase chemistry. The model incorporated a simple description of the growth of soot which assumed that acetylene was the only growth species. Soot formation was coupled with the flame chemistry via the loss of acetylene and OH on soot and the production of CO during soot oxidation. The model predicted most of the gas-phase species quite well, with the exception of OH. The loadings of soot in the flames were reporduced adequately, although less success was achieved in predicting the transition from nonsooting to sooting conditions. Details concerning the products of soot oxidation by OH were found to be important with regard to the flame chemistry. The inclusion of soot in the flame model had a significant impact on the predicted structure of the flame as seen in changes to the formation and destruction rates of OH on the fuel side of the flame. The rate of OH reaction with soot in the midregion of the flame was small compared with the rate of reaction of OH with CO. However, the two rates became comparable in the soot burnout zone.