displaying 1101 - 1110 results in total 1149
Lee, A.
view article (1.0)Audibility of Smoke Alarms in Residential Homes.Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DCCPSC-ES-0503CPSC-ES-0503
September 2005
54 p.Babrusukas, V.; Fleming, J. M.; Russell, B. D.
view article (1.0)RSET/ASET: A Flawed Concept for Fire Safety Assessment.Fire Science and Technology Inc., Issaquah WA; Boston Fire Dept., MA; Texas A&M Univ., College StationFire and Materials 2009. 11th International Conference. Conference Papers. Proceedings. Organised by Interscience Communications Limited. January 26-28, 2009, Interscience Communications Limited, London, England, San Francisco, CA, 315-328 p., 2009Lowe, G.
view article (1.0)Smoke, Heat and Flame: Making Sense of Detection.Hochiki EuropeInternational Fire Protection (IFP) Magazine, No. 34, 49-50, May 2008Skaggs, J. D.; Joyce, D. V.; Lewis, K. H.
view article (1.0)Case Study: Fire Evolution in Infant Bedding Materials, Smoke Detector Response Time, and Tenability.CASE Forensics Corp., Seattle, WAFire and Materials 2009. 11th International Conference. Conference Papers. Proceedings. Organised by Interscience Communications Limited. January 26-28, 2009, Interscience Communications Limited, London, England, San Francisco, CA, 921-930 p., 2009Beever, P.
view article (1.0)Appropriate, Acceptable or Adequate - How Much is Enough?New Zealand Fire ServiceSuppression and Detection Research Application: A Technical Working Conference. SUPDET 2009. Proceedings. Fire Protection Research Foundation. Feburary 24-27, 2009, Orlando, FL, 97-99 p., 2009Taber, B. C.; Su, J. Z.; Benichou, N.; Bwalya, A. C.; Lougheed, G. D.; Proulx, G.; Leroux, P.
view article (1.0)Smoke Detection in Full Scale House Experiments.National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, OntarioSuppression and Detection Research Application: A Technical Working Conference. SUPDET 2009. Proceedings. Fire Protection Research Foundation. Feburary 24-27, 2009, Orlando, FL, 100-102 p., 2009Mealy, C. L.; Gottuk, D. T.
view article (1.0)Smoke Alarm Response: Estimation Guidelines and Tenability Issues. Part 1.Hughes Associates, Inc., Baltimore, MDSuppression and Detection Research Application: A Technical Working Conference. SUPDET 2009. Proceedings. Fire Protection Research Foundation. Feburary 24-27, 2009, Orlando, FL, 105-110 p., 2009Mealy, C. L.; Gottuk, D. T.
view article (1.0)Smoke Alarm Response: Estimation Guidelines and Tenability Issues. Part 2.Hughes Associates, Inc., Baltimore, MDSuppression and Detection Research Application: A Technical Working Conference. SUPDET 2009. Proceedings. Fire Protection Research Foundation. Feburary 24-27, 2009, Orlando, FL, 111-125 p., 2009Fabian, T.; Hunter, G.; Patty, P. E.; Gandhi, P. D.
view article (1.0)Development of New Flaming and Smoldering Polyurethane Foam Test Protocols For UL 217 Standard on Smoke Alarms.Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., Northbrook, ILSuppression and Detection Research Application: A Technical Working Conference. SUPDET 2009. Proceedings. Fire Protection Research Foundation. Feburary 24-27, 2009, Orlando, FL, 126-128 p., 2009Milke, J. A.; Mowrer, F. W.; Gandhi, P.; Steppan, D.
view article (1.0)Guidelines for Estimating Smoke Detector Response.Maryland Univ., College Park; Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., Northbrook, ILSuppression and Detection Research Application: A Technical Working Conference. SUPDET 2009. Proceedings. Fire Protection Research Foundation. Feburary 24-27, 2009, Orlando, FL, 129-131 p., 2009