FireDOC Search

displaying 141 - 150 results in total 492

  • Cracium, I.
    view article (6.2668757)

    Risk Management in romanian Nuclear Power Plants Improves Protection.
    Fire International, No. 181, 25, November 2000

  • Hottel, H. C.; Howard, J. B.
    view article (6.2668757)

    New Energy Technology: Some Facts and Assessments, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 373 p., 1971

  • Institute for Protection and Nuclear Safety; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    view article (6.2668757)

    International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 2nd Meeting. Proceedings. Fontenay-aux-Roses,
    Institute for Protection and Nuclear Safety, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
    H.M. Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, UK; Industry Management Committee, UK; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, NUREG/CP-0173, 2000, 210 p.

  • Nowlen, S. P.; Kazarians, M.; Wyant, F.; Woods, H. W.
    view article (6.2668757)

    Risk Methods Insights Gained From Fire Incidents.
    Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM; Kazarians and Associates, Glendale, CA
    NUREG/CR-6738; SAND2001-1676P, September 2001, 282 p.

  • Miles, S.
    view article (6.2668757)

    Fire in a Large Hall. Benchmark Analysis #2. Proposal for Part 2.
    NISTIR 6986, September 2003, 569 p.
    International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Preliminary Results of Behchmark Exercise #2, Part 1, Evaluation of fire Models for Nuclear Facility. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/287-289 p., 2003

  • Roewekamp, M.; Riese, O.; Hosser, D.
    view article (6.2668757)

    Foreseen German Real Scale Cable Fire and Functional Failure Tests.
    NISTIR 6986, September 2003, 569 p.
    International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Future Tasks and Benchmark Exercises. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/303-306 p., 2003

  • Williams, N.; White, T.; Kelly, S.; Barnett, J.
    view article (6.2668757)

    Group Project 1 International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Performance Based Design FP 571.
    NISTIR 6986, September 2003, 569 p.
    International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Preliminary Results of Benchmark Exercise #2, Part 1, Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Facility Applications. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, C/117-154 p., 2003

  • Keski-Rahkonen, O.
    view article (6.2668757)

    New Model for Time Lag of Smoke Detectors.
    VTT-Technical Research Center of Finland, Espoo
    NISTIR 6986, September 2003, 569 p.
    International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Future Tasks and Benchmark Exercises. C/171-178 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/297-302 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003

  • Gritzo, L. A.
    view article (6.2668757)

    Verification, Validation and Selected Applications of the VULCAN and FUEGO Fire Field Models.
    Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM
    NISTIR 6986, September 2003, 569 p.
    International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Valication of Fire Models. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/169-177 p., 2003

  • Miles, S.
    view article (6.2668757)

    Fire in a Large Hall. Benchmark Analysis #2. Specification for Part 1.
    NISTIR 6986, September 2003, 569 p.
    International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Preliminary Results of Behchmark Exercise #2, Part 1, Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Facility. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/189-192 p., 2003