displaying 331 - 340 results in total 1149
Scheidweiler, A.
view article (1.0)Physical Aspects of Ionization Chamber Measuring Techniques (Unipolar and Bipolar Chambers).Cerberus AG, Mannedorf, SwitzerlandNational Research Council. Fire Detection for Life Safety. March 31-April 1, 1975, 188-198 p., 1975Pearsall, D. D.
view article (1.0)Ionization Smoke Detection: Application to Life Safety in Dwellings.Statitrol Corp., Lakewood, CONational Research Council. Fire Detection for Life Safety. March 31-April 1, 1975, 199-209 p., 1975Consumer Reports
view article (1.0)Are Smoke Detectors Hazardous?Consumer Reports, Vol. 42, No. 1, 52-54, January 1977Maguire, H. M.
view article (1.0)Seattle Stresses Home Smoke Detectors in Neighborhood Meetings After a Fire.Seattle Fire Dept., WAFire Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 12, 27-28, December 1976Fire Engineering
view article (1.0)Edmonton Loses Detector Battle But Continues War to Save Lives.Fire Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 11, 122-123, November 1976Schifiliti, R. P.
view article (1.0)Use of Fire Plume Theory in the Design and Analysis of Fire Detector and Sprinkler Response.Worcester Polytechnic Institute, MAThesisThesis
January 1986
389 p.Kraus, F. J.
view article (1.0)Fire Indication in the Development Stage of the Fire--Heat Indicator, Flame Indicator and the Smoke Indicator.Brandschutz/Deutsche Feuerwehrzeitung, No. 7, 1-13, 1975Consumer Reports
view article (1.0)Smoke Detectors.Consumer Reports, Vol. 41, No. 10, 555-559, October 1976Portscht, R.
view article (1.0)Comparison of the Physical Measuring Principles of Smoke Detectors of Automatic Fire Alarm Systems.Z VFDB, Vol. 22, No. 3, 110-112, 1973 <b>AND</b> Z VFDB, Vol. 23, No. 2, 57-65, 1974,Rose, M.
view article (1.0)Detector Hot-Air Sales Pitch Misleads Public.Minnesota Fire Chief, Vol. 13, No. 1, 16,55, September/October 1976