displaying 31 - 36 results in total 36
Mealy, C. L.; Gottuk, D. T.
view article (1.0)Smoke Alarm Response: Estimation Guidelines and Tenability Issues. Part 2.Hughes Associates, Inc., Baltimore, MDSuppression and Detection Research Application: A Technical Working Conference. SUPDET 2009. Proceedings. Fire Protection Research Foundation. Feburary 24-27, 2009, Orlando, FL, 111-125 p., 2009Cleary, T. G.
view article (1.0)Performance of Dual Photoelectric/Ionization Smoke Alarms in Full-Scale Fire Tests.National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MDSuppression and Detection Research Application: A Technical Working Conference, 13th Annual. SUPDET 2009. Proceedings. Fire Protection Research Foundation. Feburary 24-27, 2009, Orlando, FL, 2009Cleary, T. G.
view article (1.0)Results From a Full Scale Smoke Alarm Sensitivity Study.National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MDSuppression and Detection Research Application: A Technical Working Conference, 13th Annual. SUPDET 2009. Proceedings. Fire Protection Research Foundation. Feburary 24-27, 2009, Orlando, FL, 2009Emmerich, S. J.; Howard-Reed, C.; Gupte, A.
view article (1.0)Modeling the IAQ Impact of HH1 Interventions in Inner-City Housing.National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MDNISTIR 7212Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, NISTIR 7212
March 2005
99 p.Su, J. Z.; Crampton, G. P.
view article (1.0)Experimental Examination of Dead Air Space for Smoke Alarms.National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, OntarioFire Technology, Vol. 45, No. 1/1st Quarter, 97-115, March 2009Sprinkler Age
view article (1.0)Sprinklers Proven to Protect the Environment.Sprinkler Age, Vol. 29, No. 2, 22-22, February 2010