FireDOC Search

Author
Kassawara, R. P. | Hyslop, J. S.
Title
Fire PRA Methodology for Nuclear Power Facilities. Volume 2. Detailed Methodology. Preliminary Report.
Coporate
Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
Report
EPRI 1008239; NUREG/CR-6850; Volume 2, October 2004, 620 p.
Keywords
nuclear power plants | methodology | fire risk assessment | risk analysis | decision making | fire protection | NFPA 805 | fire models | reliability | human response | systems engineering | cables | ignition | heat release rate | damage | failure analysis | failure modes | fire risks | uncertainity | sensitivity analysis
Identifiers
Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA); Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI); plant boundary definition and partitioning; fire PRA components selection; fire PRA cable selection; qualitative screening; fire-induced risk model; fire ignition frequencies; detailed circuit failure analysis; circuit failure mode likelihood analysis; detailed fire modeling; post-fire human reliability analysis
Abstract
This report documents state-of-the-art methods, tools, and data for the conduct of a fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) for a commercial nuclear power plant (NPP) application. This report is intended to serve the needs of a fire risk analysis team by providing a structured framework for conduct of the overall analysis, as well as specific recommended practices to address each key aspect of the analysis. The methods have been developed under the Fire Risk Requantification Study. This study was conducted as a joint activity between the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) under the terms of an EPRI/RES Memorandum of Understanding and an accompanying Fire Research Addendum. Participants from the U.S. Nuclear Power Industry supported demonstration analyses and provided peer review of this methodology. Methodological issues raised in past fire risk analyses, including the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) fire analyses, have been addressed to the extent allowed by the current state-of-the-art and the overall project scope. While the primary objective of the project was to consolidate existing state-of-the-art methods, in many areas, the newly documented methods represent a significant advancement over previously documented methods.